Posted at 1:01 am (U.S. Eastern) 4/7/2013  I appreciated the last paragraphs of the article where Rivera talks about the implications of evolution for our understanding of creation – as he says, ‘a richer understanding

2/2/10 I remember reading a newspaper article about how they designed the wing of a plane by introducing random changes and selecting for improvements, imitating natural selection. I think it was a time when I

6/21/08 Evangelical buffoonery on scientific matters betrays a deep and latent gnostic infection – North American evangelicals, in my experience, too frequently veer right to the brink of outright Gnostic heresy. [Quintessence of Dust blog

“In conclusion: naturalistic explanations of ordinary phenomena do not threaten God’s involvement with creation.” “the shifting of our scientific worldview – initiated by the faithful study of God’s creation (not new exegetical insights)” “As much

“The methodology of Scientific inquiry simply has nothing to say about the ultimate cause of those ordinary patterns of God’s providence found in nature.” [Glover 0408] “If certain individuals are using (or abusing) science to

Edward B. Davis, ‘”The Word and Works: Concordism and American Evangelicals” in ”Perspectives on an Evolving Creation,” Ed. Keith B. Miller – quotes Bernard Ramm in his book ‘The Christian View of Science and Scripture’